Dilma to the Legislature– A Few Promises

PROMISES

1.  The PAC2 stands for the Program for Growth Acceleration 2, and it’s not a midnight TV infomercial. It’s government’s gimmicky excuse to spend lots of money, $955 billion Reales over the next four years, or close to $600 billion U.S. The Program is for national development—highways, hydro-electricity projects, school and hospital building—the stuff you would expect a government to spend its money on anyways. We just hope there is transparency in what is spent. Anecdotal evidence tells us no: the PAC website makes no mention of the Program’s commitment to transparency, and there is more than one article and blog on the Program’s lack of transparency.

2. $________ . A minimum floor for teacher salaries.  In Korea teachers are considered nation builders. But teacher’s in Brazil must find it difficult to build nations when they earn under $600 US a month, especially when working conditions are dreadful. You get what you pay for; students typically don’t stick around: in 2006 the average Brazilian spent just over 7 years in formal schooling.  The minimum floor would be set around $1000R (~$600).

3. Tax Reform…no details given, but a goal that has eluded previous presidents.

4. International Disaster Prevention System…a response to the recent mudslides and the yearly disasters caused by erosion, rain, and bad building locations.

A FEW THINGS SAID

-Dilma called Brazil’s new oil finds the country’s ”passport to the future”. That’s what Nigeria, Venezuela and Libya said when they found oil.  Let’s hope so.

-28 million people stepped over the poverty line in the past 8 years. Huge advance.

2 Comments

  • Greg,

    Any thoughts on if (and why or why not) Brazil will handle the oil windfall better than Nigeria, Libya, and particularly Venezuela? It seems to me that democracy has a stronger foothold in Brazil than in the other 3, but I am far from an expert on these things.

    • Venezuela was considered the most stable democracy in Latin America for a long time, although in truth it was an elite-pact quasi-democracy. There is still some “quasi” in Brazil’s democracy, but you’re right, Brazil is on a far more stable footing than these other (exaggerated) examples.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *